Should
you lobby your MP?
Recently we met with our MP to ask him to support
our concerns over the marginalisation of Christians in Britain.
Afterwards we discussed how we could encourage other Christians
to get involved in active lobbying, in the hope of reversing or
at least restraining laws which are now placing British
Christians at odds with ‘officialdom’ in general.
Given that this could now be nothing more than a rearguard
action, we were uncertain whether it is something which The LORD
is really calling His people to do. The last thing Mary and I
want to do is to motivate Christians with a further set of false
promises - there have been far too many of these circulating
amongst the churches in recent decades.
Who is on The LORD’s side?
I pondered this question for a while and began to
realise that such a call to arms needs to be accompanied with a
warning that The LORD sometimes refuses to fight with His people.
This may seem a strange thought to some, but the Bible reminds us
several times that the important question is not, is God on our
side, but are we on His? It is very easy to motivate
people with promises of a better future, ‘prophecies’
of a more successful Church around the corner, or of a more
Christian nation if we do a, b and c. Such offers of brighter
tomorrows have always been welcomed with open arms. This is not a
problem peculiar to the Church; it was a
significant factor in causing Israel to entertain false prophets
by the score, whilst at the same time persecuting those who
brought The LORD’s true burden to them. About such prophets
Jeremiah twice warned, “They have also healed the hurt of
My people slightly, Saying, ‘Peace, peace!’ When
there is no peace.” (Ch. 6 & 8).
In the New Testament, Paul
warned the ill-disciplined church in Corinth that those
Israelites who died in the wilderness had all benefited from
similar blessings to those enjoyed by Christians through the New
Covenant. However, he reminded his readers that “with most
of them God was not well pleased.” He said their wrong
attitudes should serve as a warning to Christians to avoid the
fleshly desires which had motivated those Israelites. Listing
things such as idolatry, sexual immorality and being discontent
with God, he emphasised, “Now these things happened to them
as an example, and they were written for our instruction, upon
whom the ends of the ages have come.” This passage (1 Cor.
10:1-14) is often summarised by the phrase, “Avoid Israel’s
mistakes!”
If therefore I'm to
encourage you as a Christian to roll up your sleeves and go into
battle, then it is important to warn you of the things which
caused Israel to be defeated by their enemies. I should also
restate the obvious, that in Ephesians 6 Paul made it clear that
our real opponents are not the politicians, the media nor the
secular activists, but the principalities, the rulers of the
darkness of this age and the spiritual hosts of wickedness in the
heavenly places, which use such people for purposes they don’t
fully understand. Also, if we are to “stand against the
wiles of the devil” then “having done all, to stand”,
then we need as Paul urges to be wearing the full armour of God
in our own lives, (an ongoing commitment to truth, righteousness,
faith, a knowledge of our salvation, a constant readiness to
proclaim the Gospel of Christ and a desire to know the voice of
The LORD so that we have a knowledge of His will).
A battle lost!
In Israel’s day,
their enemies were the nations which stood in the way of them
possessing the land which they had been promised by The LORD.
After their deliverance from Egypt they made good progress across
the desert and were soon approaching the boundary of that land.
During their journey they had been given the Law through Moses at
Mt. Sinai. This included the promises and warnings recorded in
Leviticus 26. Eleven verses in this chapter list the benefits of
being people who “walk in My statutes and keep My
commandments”, whilst thirty warn of the consequences of
not doing so. They are warned that disobedience will cause them
“to be delivered into the hand of the enemy” by The
LORD. It was failing to take this warning to heart which led to
defeat when Israel first went into battle.
Israel had been delivered
from Egypt and had seen Pharaoh’s armies destroyed without
wielding a sword. However, when their Deliverer told them to go
in and possess the land which He had promised to Abraham, they
refused to do so. They refused because they were terrified by the
unbelief of ten out of the twelve men who had been sent ahead as
spies. Numbers 14 details how The LORD threatened to destroy them
there and then; after Moses had interceded on their behalf, He
promised not to do this, but instead decreed that that generation
would die in the wilderness over the next forty years. At this
point the people should have humbled themselves before The LORD
and accepted His judgement, but the chapter ends with them
attacking the Amalekites and the Canaanites, despite Moses’
warning that they should not do so. The consequence of that
unbelief was that The LORD did not go with them, and they were
driven back by their enemies.
A key Biblical commentary
on this passage is Psalm 95, where David wrote, “Today, if
you will hear His voice: Do not harden your hearts, as in the
rebellion.” The writer of Hebrews cites this warning in
chapters 3 and 4. The author does not beat about the bush, but
strongly asserts that their failure to obey was the outcome of
their unbelief and it was this which prevented them from entering
into His rest. He commented on this event because he was
reminding his Christian readers that post-Calvary there is also a
rest for the people of God to enter into and he warns us against
allowing our own unbelief to prevent us from doing this. My own
reason for pointing out these things is slightly different.
Israel lost their first ever battle because they fought it at
their own instigation, rather than at The LORD’s command.
They put themselves into that situation because of a double dose
of unbelief. Their first rebellion was in refusing to attack the
inhabitants of the land when they were commanded to do so. Their
second rebellion occurred when they did attack them, having been
told not to.
A second defeat
Forty years later, when
Israel was next told to enter Canaan, they were on the whole more
successful. Their most famous battle was actually not a battle.
Once more they didn’t have to lift a sword until The LORD
had taken Jericho for them. In His instructions before the
victory He had told them that the gold, silver and other metals
they would find there were to be dedicated to Him and they were
banned from keeping them for themselves. Joshua 7 records how
just one man disobeyed that command, taking a garment and some
gold and silver and hiding them under his tent. Consequently when
Israel next went into battle, The LORD was once again not with
them and they were defeated by the men of Ai. The LORD told
Joshua the reason for their defeat and the next day He pointed
out through the drawing of lots who the culprit was. Achan’s
disobedience, which arose from his failure to take God seriously,
cost him far more than the value of the things he had coveted. He
and all his family were stoned to death (for they had conspired
with him) and their possessions were burned. The LORD then gave
Israel victory over Ai.
What can we learn from
these two defeats experienced by Israel? Do they have any
relevance to the situation of the Church in Britain and other
Western societies as we see the advance of secularism and the
marginalisation of Christians which results? I suggest that we
must first acknowledge that unbelief and the disobedience which
it generates have been far too abundant in the Church, as they
were for Israel in the wilderness. Whilst we should not have a
rosy picture of the past (Ecclesiastes 7:10), we should also
recognise that in recent decades Christians have failed to agree
with their God on far too wide a range of issues. The majority of
Christians have desired friendship with the world far more than
they sought to walk in The LORD’s ways, which is a familiar
quality of human nature. Consequently for many years now we have
failed to stand firm for Him and for His standards. Instead we
have accommodated the alternative ‘morals’ of the
godless, not wishing to offend them. How can we expect The LORD
to fight with us when we have not heeded the warning of Psalm 95,
and have allowed our own hearts to be hardened against His voice?
Jesus warned His disciples
that they could not serve two masters; either His Father or the
god of this world will have final say in the choices we make.
Many Christians, not having ears to hear, have failed to take
seriously our Saviour's command to “seek first the
kingdom of God and His righteousness.” By failing to trust
Him to provide all our needs, we have ended up taking the values
and the things of this world into our lives so much that they are
firmly lodged in our churches, as well as in our families. If we
desire to see the tide of secularism turned, we should first
examine ourselves to see whether we have allowed its values to
become embedded in our own thinking? Do we live with desires,
ambitions and values which The LORD has decreed belong to those
who are perishing? One paradox of Scripture is this: whilst
Christ told us we must love Him more than we love our family, the
Israelites in Deuteronomy 28 were warned that disobedience would
cost them their wives and their children. Could we, like Achan,
be sacrificing our children and their futures through our
unbelief in the seriousness of our God’s commands?
An invitation to
dinner
By now you may be thinking the the
situation is hopeless, since much of the Church is shot through
with unbelief. Before you throw in the towel, let me offer you
some hope. It is true that throughout history the Church has been
a field full of wheat and tares growing side by side. If we pin
our hopes for the future on a Church without faults, then we will
be crushed by despair. Christ recognised this when He addressed a
church which was such a mixture it was neither hot nor cold. His
message to the church in Laodicea (Revelation 3) has been
relevant to the Church in every century since John recorded it.
Unfortunately one of His most famous statements therein is also
one of the most misquoted. The door on which He described Himself
as knocking on was not the life of a non-Christian individual,
but that of an apparently Christian church. This church however
had excluded their Saviour from their meetings. Christ’s
remedy for this unbelievable situation was not to call for a
church meeting to vote Him back into membership, but a promise to
individuals who were willing to hear His voice and to open the
door to Him. To those willing to do this, He said He would dine
with them and them with Him. I encourage you therefore to take
your eyes off the failures of others in the Church and fix them
firmly on Jesus Christ and to determine to keep your own
relationship with Him open and living.
Should
you therefore lobby your MP? I hope you will, but I don’t
want you to do it on my say-so alone. You need to know His will
for you. Concerning many things we have the testimony of the
Scriptures to guide us, but without the guidance of the Holy
Spirit, living by them is reduced to legalism. We all need to be
regularly dining with Christ and paying close attention to His
words to us. From that fellowship will come a concern to stand up
for Christ in every situation as His ambassadors on earth.
Remember though, we won’t be able to stand firm in that
battle unless we are doing the same at home, at work, or anywhere
else where we find ourselves pressurised to agree with the world.
In particular we need to resist the pressure to bow before the
aggressive secularism which is at large in society today.
If
you are prepared to stand - by yourself if necessary - with the
God of righteousness, if you are prepared to turn away from
unbelief in every aspect of your own life, you will want to
publicly agree with Christ and make it clear that you will not
call evil good, nor good evil. In that case, it may be worthwhile
telling your MP that you are concerned about the way our culture
and our legislation is rapidly shifting to a place where to seek
to live by an informed Christian conscience is considered a
danger to society!
Stand for Christ not for Britain
Whilst
I hope that many who read this will take up such a cause and will
engage in a prolonged conversation with politicians, what I
cannot promise you is that a flow of correspondence with MPs will
guarantee that the tide away from Christianity in Britain will be
turned. If that is your motivation for speaking out, I don't want
you to be overcome by despair should your hopes not be realised.
As I said at the start, abundant false promises of revival and
the subsequent reformation of society have been circulating for
decades. None of these have been fulfilled and this is because
they based on human hopes and not on Biblical truths. It has
rightly been said that those who believe an illusion end up being
disillusioned.
In
Matthew 24, when answering questions about the destruction of
Jerusalem and the end of history, Jesus warned His disciples that
as His return approached, His followers would be “hated by
all nations for My name’s sake”. In a similar passage
(Luke 21) Christ posed the question, “However, when the Son
of Man comes, will He find faith on the earth?” It is very
possible, taking these and other passages seriously, that the
secularisation of Britain is part of the events which must take
place before every eye sees Him, before every knee bows before
Him and before every tongue confesses that He is Lord to His
Father’s glory. If it is, then to work for its reversal
will result in despair for those who do so. Far better to be
motivated by the desire to honour Jesus Christ, your Saviour and
Redeemer, and to confess Him before all you know.
I
close with the words of Christ: “Therefore whoever
confesses Me before men, him I will also confess before My Father
who is in heaven. But whoever denies Me before men, him I will
also deny before My Father who is in heaven.” Matthew
10:32-33
Randall
Hardy - March 2011
PDF
version of this article
|